Champion profile

Lillia in draft

Played at Jungle in 99% of its games. A role under 30 games still opens, with counts only.

Presence (pick + ban)

13 %

picked or banned · 60th of 173 championshalf of the champions are under 9.5%

Picked 7% · 1,239 of 18,774 gamesBanned 6% · 1,047 of 17,742 drafts with bans

Win rate at Jungle

18,821 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR

Population: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes — neither solo queue nor the pro scene.

Everything below reads on 1,227 games at Jungle. · 501 drafts without entered bans excluded from the ban denominator (17,742 games with bans) · Index built on Oct 27, 2026, 1:37 AM

In short

Four answers. Each card opens its chapter.

01 · In draftOpening ban: removed in phase 1.Banned, it makes room for

Zyra

Kindred

02 · In a compWhat sets it apart from other junglersTeamfightDamagePoke

03 · With / againstGood against Gwen, bad against Milio.Good against

Gwen73%30 gamesBad against

Milio34%68 gamesBad duo withno clear pairGood duo with

Rell79%47 games

04 · BuildOne path: Liandry's Torment.

Conqueror

Ban it or pick it?

Its place in the scene's drafts, and what happens when it is not there.

Where it is played

Share of Jungle picks taken by Lillia, and its ban share, in each source

SoloQ

Master+ · ranked games of tracked players

2.1%11,625 picks out of 558,542banned in 2.9% of games · 2,549 of 86,901patches 16.21 → 16.19filtered by region

Tournaments

tournament code games

3.7%804 picks out of 21,472banned in 6.3% of games · 641 of 10,152patches 16.21 → 16.19filtered by region

Pro

all leagues · lolesports

0.2%5 picks out of 2,194lolesports does not provide banspatches 16.20 → 16.17region filter not applicable

Frequency only: share of the role's picks in each source, over ITS last 3 patches with games — the page's period does not apply · under 30 games in the role, not measured · the three sources are never added up · ban share over games whose bans are read only (soloQ: games collected since 10/17)

Presence by patch

Between 6% and 16% since 16.12 · 16.3% on 16.21 · 14.2% on 16.20

show the detail of the 10 patches

Patch	Presence	Games	Majority keystone
16.21	16.3%	2,671	Conqueror100% · 201
16.20	14.2%	7,858	Conqueror99% · 551
16.19	9.3%	6,733	Conqueror99% · 343
16.18	8.0%	5,762	Conqueror98% · 214
16.17	11.2%	5,728	Conqueror99% · 309
16.16	10.3%	5,992	Conqueror99% · 316
16.15	10.5%	5,530	Conqueror98% · 315
16.14	6.6%	5,702	Conqueror99% · 214
16.13	6.3%	7,391	Conqueror99% · 256
16.12	5.5%	5,118	Conqueror99% · 135

Presence = picks + bans over the patch's games, all regions · the axis follows the calendar: a patch without games leaves a void · hollow point under 30 games, nothing compared

When it gets banned

Opening ban: removed in phase 1.

1,047 bans of 17,742 drafts with bans · the phase in strong ink grounds the reading line

Fearless

Fearless: fallback pick — brought out late in the series, once the pool is drained.

G16.3%
G27.1%
G3+9.7%

Once burnt, the series moves to

Lee Sin26

Jarvan IV20

Vi17

series, of 266 where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role

Share of each series game where it is picked · replacements: series where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role (266), published from 30 series

If it is banned, they pick

What is played more often at Jungle when Lillia is banned than when it is free, on both sides.

Read at Jungle, its main role: a ban has no role, it takes this one away first.

Zyra
2.0% → 3.9%
Kindred
1.9% → 3.3%
Ekko
1.8% → 3.0%

show 2 other champions

Gwen
1.1% → 2.9%
Jax
1.0% → 1.9%

1,047 games where it is banned · 15,514 where it is free and not picked · share of the role's picks: ○ free → ● banned · what the ban brings out, never why

When it is picked, the scene protects itself from

No feared counter: comps with Lillia ban nothing in phase 2 more than usual.

× = phase 2 bans in its comps relative to other comps, kept from ×1.25 · 44,638 tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12, the draft review window

What does it bring to a comp?

What its kit brings to its team, phase by phase, then in fights.

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other junglers

Phase by phase

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Damage / mintick = the junglers

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Gold vs. direct opponent

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Not measured after 20 min: gold then follows the game's result.

Map pressuretakedowns outside its lane

Lane · 5–14 min5 takedowns outside its lane before 15 min · junglers: 4.7

After 15 min

Measured before 15 min only.

Damage to champions per minute, at equal gold · gold against the direct opponent on a fixed ± 1,000 scale · map pressure before 15 min

In fights

itjunglers
Damage absorbed per minute.
Share of its takedowns taken with several allies.
Share of its takedowns taken in a duel.
Damage from its four allies per kill when it takes part: a high rank means it lets its allies carry the damage, a low rank that it carries it itself.
Riot CC score per minute.
Share of its team's damage.

Bar centred on junglers: to the right, more than them; to the left, less · fixed order, never sorted by value

What it is, what it is not

What marks itTeamfightDamagePoke

What it is not

Nothing below junglers.

Split-push — Not applicable to this position.

Labels set by the server: the fact's criterion when it has one, otherwise the role rank (from 75 or at 25 and below)

Its tempo

level 6 at 6:42 (7:00), 1st item at 10:48 (10:42), 2nd at 18:54 (18:54), 3rd at 25:30 (25:24).

1,227 games · median minute of each milestone, junglers in brackets

Its jungle

70 jungle CS at 10 min · junglers: 66
8% of the time in the enemy jungle between 2 and 14 min · junglers: 7%

With whom, against whom?

The win rate is a range: only a range entirely on one side of 50% says something.

Allies and opponents

Its opponents, most frequent first.

Facing	Games	Reading
WukongJGL	184	Evenbetween 46% and 58%
NautilusSUP	130	Leans its waybetween 47% and 62%
Kai'SaADC	111	Favourablebetween 51% and 66%
CaitlynADC	105	Leans against itbetween 38% and 54%
JhinADC	103	Evenbetween 43% and 59%
YunaraADC	103	Leans against itbetween 38% and 54%
LuluSUP	101	Leans its waybetween 48% and 64%
Lee SinJGL	99	Evenbetween 41% and 58%
EzrealADC	92	Favourablebetween 55% and 71%
JinxADC	91	Evenbetween 43% and 60%

show 197 other pairs

BraumSUP	90	Evenbetween 40% and 58%
ViktorMID	82	Evenbetween 42% and 60%
LeonaSUP	78	Leans its waybetween 45% and 63%
BlitzcrankSUP	72	Evenbetween 41% and 60%
AmbessaTOP	70	Leans its waybetween 46% and 65%
ThreshSUP	70	Leans its waybetween 49% and 68%
K'SanteTOP	69	Evenbetween 42% and 62%
ViJGL	69	Leans its waybetween 50% and 69%
SyndraMID	69	Evenbetween 40% and 59%
MilioSUP	68	Unfavourablebetween 25% and 44%
Jarvan IVJGL	63	Evenbetween 38% and 58%
SylasJGL	60	Evenbetween 40% and 60%
SejuaniJGL	59	Leans its waybetween 44% and 65%
AhriMID	59	Evenbetween 39% and 60%
RakanSUP	57	Leans its waybetween 47% and 68%
YoneTOP	55	Evenbetween 40% and 62%
SionTOP	54	Leans its waybetween 50% and 71%
SylasMID	54	Leans against itbetween 34% and 56%
AsheADC	53	Evenbetween 36% and 58%
LucianADC	53	Unfavourablebetween 24% and 45%
XayahADC	52	Leans against itbetween 35% and 57%
MalphiteTOP	51	Leans its waybetween 45% and 68%
OrnnTOP	50	Evenbetween 39% and 61%
ApheliosADC	50	Favourablebetween 50% and 72%
RellSUP	50	Leans against itbetween 35% and 58%
YuumiSUP	50	Leans against itbetween 35% and 58%
AlistarSUP	49	Leans its waybetween 47% and 70%
KarmaSUP	49	Leans its waybetween 45% and 68%
RenektonTOP	46	Leans its waybetween 42% and 66%
Xin ZhaoJGL	46	Evenbetween 40% and 64%
GalioMID	46	Leans its waybetween 42% and 66%
YoneMID	46	Evenbetween 36% and 60%
LeBlancMID	44	Leans its waybetween 47% and 70%
OriannaMID	44	Leans its waybetween 47% and 70%
Cho'GathJGL	43	Favourablebetween 50% and 74%
AkaliMID	43	Leans its waybetween 43% and 68%
SivirADC	42	Leans its waybetween 47% and 71%
JaxTOP	41	Evenbetween 36% and 61%
NasusTOP	41	Leans against itbetween 28% and 52%
LissandraMID	41	Leans its waybetween 41% and 66%
AatroxTOP	40	Favourablebetween 52% and 76%
NocturneJGL	40	Leans its waybetween 50% and 74%
AuroraMID	39	Evenbetween 36% and 62%
Miss FortuneADC	39	Leans its waybetween 41% and 66%
TristanaADC	39	Leans its waybetween 46% and 71%
VarusADC	39	Leans its waybetween 41% and 66%
SeraphineSUP	39	Leans its waybetween 41% and 66%
Dr. MundoTOP	37	Leans against itbetween 33% and 59%
GnarTOP	35	Leans against itbetween 25% and 51%
OlafTOP	35	Evenbetween 38% and 65%
ZeriADC	35	Evenbetween 35% and 62%
VexMID	34	Leans its waybetween 45% and 72%
NaafiriJGL	33	Leans its waybetween 49% and 76%
LockeMID	33	Leans against itbetween 32% and 60%
Twisted FateMID	33	Evenbetween 38% and 65%
MordekaiserTOP	32	Leans against itbetween 28% and 55%
SkarnerJGL	32	Favourablebetween 51% and 78%
CamilleTOP	31	Leans against itbetween 29% and 57%
ViegoJGL	31	Leans against itbetween 29% and 57%
ZacJGL	31	Leans against itbetween 31% and 60%
GwenTOP	30	Favourablebetween 59% and 84%
ZaahenTOP	30	Leans its waybetween 39% and 67%
HweiMID	29	Too few for a rate (29 of 30)
ZedMID	29	Too few for a rate (29 of 30)
GragasTOP	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
RumbleTOP	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
ShenTOP	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
MorganaSUP	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
NeekoSUP	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
KindredJGL	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
RyzeMID	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
XerathMID	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
HecarimJGL	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
BardSUP	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
PykeSUP	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
KennenTOP	24	Too few for a rate (24 of 30)
Kha'ZixJGL	24	Too few for a rate (24 of 30)
CassiopeiaMID	24	Too few for a rate (24 of 30)
MalzaharMID	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
JayceJGL	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
KalistaADC	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
JayceTOP	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
QiyanaJGL	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
CorkiADC	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
MaokaiSUP	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
YorickTOP	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
GalioMID	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
MelMID	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
ZedJGL	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
DianaMID	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
SettTOP	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
ZiggsADC	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
AkaliTOP	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
NidaleeJGL	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
PoppySUP	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
DianaJGL	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
KassadinMID	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
ViktorADC	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
Cho'GathTOP	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
GarenTOP	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
IreliaMID	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
SionMID	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
IreliaTOP	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
AatroxJGL	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
GravesJGL	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
MaokaiJGL	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
TrundleJGL	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
AnnieMID	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
AzirMID	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
VeigarMID	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
SamiraADC	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
Renata GlascSUP	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
GangplankTOP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
KaynJGL	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
PantheonJGL	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
TaliyahMID	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
DravenADC	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
TwitchADC	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
CamilleSUP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
MaokaiTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
PoppyTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
RammusJGL	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
TaliyahJGL	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
AniviaMID	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
NasusMID	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
QiyanaMID	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
MelADC	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
XerathADC	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
GalioSUP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
SennaSUP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
SylasSUP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
FioraTOP	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
VarusTOP	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
EliseJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
NaafiriJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
Rek'SaiJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
TalonJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
MalphiteMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
TristanaMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
YasuoMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
VayneADC	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
EliseSUP	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
WukongTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
VayneTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
VolibearTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
YasuoTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
NaafiriJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
ZyraJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
EkkoMID	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
LuxMID	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
ZoeMID	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
PantheonSUP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
IllaoiTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
TrundleTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
Bel'VethJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
WarwickJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
Aurelion SolMID	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
SmolderADC	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
SorakaSUP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
Tahm KenchSUP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
AmumuJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
EkkoJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
JayceMID	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
VladimirMID	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
Kog'MawADC	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
SeraphineADC	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
AmumuSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
MelSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
NamiSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
SkarnerSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
ZileanSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
ZyraSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
GalioTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
JayceTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
PantheonTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
UrgotTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
WarwickTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
GwenJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
PoppyJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
AatroxMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
AmbessaMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
CorkiMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
SwainMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
SwainADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
VarusADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
VeigarADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
LuxSUP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
JayceTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
KledTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
PantheonTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
SingedTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
Tahm KenchTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
ZacTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
Cho'GathJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
TalonMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
JannaSUP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
SwainSUP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)

Sorted by number of games · 207 pairs in this view.

Allies and opponents over 1,227 games, listed from 5 games per pair; under 30 games, only W/L counts are written.

How is it built?

Keystone, spells, first skill maxed and item paths, on the fallback level that has enough games.

The usual build

Read on patch 16.21, filtered regions.

Patch + region16.21 · 137 games
Patch16.21 · 202 games
2 patches760 games
Window1,227 games

Keystone + secondary tree

Conqueror+

Inspiration

99% · 136 games

Summoner spells

Flash + Smite

100% · 137 games

First maxed skill

100% · 137 games

show 2 other choices of runes, spells or skill maxed

Other runes

orDark Harvest+Sorcery1% · 1 game
orConqueror+Sorcery6% · 8 games

137 games at the level read · a level is read from 30 games

Item paths

One item path, from the most played 1st item to the least.

Liandry's Torment98% · 10:36
Riftmaker85% · 18:42
Zhonya's Hourglass72% · 25:18

Each % reads along the path: at the 1st item, over the games that completed a 1st item; then, over those that made the previous steps AND completed one more item. A path stops under 10 games · median minute the item is completed, from 3 games.

show how we count

Draft, with / against and build: the filters at the top of the page (window, regions, level). What follows the meta moves fast.
In a comp and “the scene protects itself from”: 180 days of tournaments (from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12), the draft review window. A champion's kit changes little, it needs volume.
All games come from Master+ amateur tournaments. No soloQ.
A win rate is written from 30 games, always with its range. Under that threshold, wins and losses are written.
What the data does not say: the pick order (missing from the Riot API), engage (no reliable measure).