Champion profile

Renata Glasc in draft

Played at Support in 99% of its games. A role under 30 games still opens, with counts only.

Presence (pick + ban)

3 %

picked or banned · 137th of 173 championshalf of the champions are under 8.8%

Picked 3% · 698 of 26,227 gamesBanned 1% · 152 of 21,707 drafts with bans

Win rate at Support

28,125 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 67% · EUW 23% · NA 10%

Population: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes — neither solo queue nor the pro scene.

Everything below reads on 694 games at Support. · 992 drafts without entered bans excluded from the ban denominator (21,707 games with bans) · Index built on Oct 26, 2026, 1:34 AM

In short

Four answers. Each card opens its chapter.

01 · In draftResponse ban: removed in phase 2, after the first picks.Banned, it makes room for

Alistar

Rell

02 · In a compWhat sets it apart from other supportsTeamfightFew duelsLittle damageNo poke

03 · With / againstGood against Hwei, bad against Ornn.Good against

Hwei68%31 gamesBad against

Ornn34%41 gamesBad duo withno clear pairGood duo with

Syndra71%48 games

04 · Build3 paths: Locket of the Iron Solari or Mikael's Blessing or Knight's Vow.

Guardian

Ban it or pick it?

Its place in the scene's drafts, and what happens when it is not there.

Where it is played

Share of Support picks taken by Renata Glasc, and its ban share, in each source

SoloQ

Master+ · ranked games of tracked players

1.1%16,314 picks out of 1,512,268banned in 0.3% of games · 736 of 223,526patches 16.21 → 16.19

Tournaments

tournament code games

1.4%444 picks out of 30,800banned in 0.8% of games · 96 of 12,018patches 16.21 → 16.19

Pro

all leagues · lolesports

7.3%160 picks out of 2,182lolesports does not provide banspatches 16.20 → 16.17

Frequency only: share of the role's picks in each source, over ITS last 3 patches with games — the page's period does not apply · under 30 games in the role, not measured · the three sources are never added up · ban share over games whose bans are read only (soloQ: games collected since 10/17)

Presence by patch

Between 1% and 4% since 16.8 · 3.3% on 16.21 · 3.9% on 16.20

show the detail of the 11 patches

Patch	Presence	Games	Majority keystone
16.21	3.3%	970	Guardian91% · 21
16.20	3.9%	7,756	Guardian87% · 212
16.19	3.4%	6,674	Guardian91% · 162
16.18	3.6%	5,755	Guardian88% · 139
16.17	2.0%	5,712	Guardian97% · 95
16.16	1.8%	5,979	Guardian88% · 78
16.15	1.2%	5,519	Guardian83% · 40
16.14	1.1%	5,697	Guardian94% · 48
16.13	1.7%	7,360	Guardian86% · 91
16.12	1.7%	5,098	Guardian90% · 62
16.8	1.5%	205	Guardian67% · 2

Presence = picks + bans over the patch's games, all regions · the axis follows the calendar: a patch without games leaves a void · hollow point under 30 games, nothing compared

When it gets banned

Response ban: removed in phase 2, after the first picks.

152 bans of 21,707 drafts with bans · the phase in strong ink grounds the reading line

Fearless

Fearless: fallback pick — brought out late in the series, once the pool is drained.

G12.1%
G23.2%
G3+4.0%

Once burnt, the series moves to

Lulu18

Rakan13

Nautilus11

series, of 132 where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role

Share of each series game where it is picked · replacements: series where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role (132), published from 30 series

If it is banned, they pick

What is played more often at Support when Renata Glasc is banned than when it is free, on both sides.

Read at Support, its main role: a ban has no role, it takes this one away first.

Alistar
7.7% → 15.1%
Rell
8.3% → 14.5%
Rakan
8.8% → 13.2%

152 games where it is banned · 21,022 where it is free and not picked · share of the role's picks: ○ free → ● banned · what the ban brings out, never why

When it is picked, the scene protects itself from

No feared counter: comps with Renata Glasc ban nothing in phase 2 more than usual.

× = phase 2 bans in its comps relative to other comps, kept from ×1.25 · 44,638 tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12, the draft review window

What does it bring to a comp?

What its kit brings to its team, phase by phase, then in fights.

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other supports

Phase by phase

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Damage / mintick = the supports

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Gold vs. direct opponent

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Not measured after 20 min: gold then follows the game's result.

Map pressuretakedowns outside its lane

Lane · 5–14 min4.3 takedowns outside its lane before 15 min · supports: 4.5

After 15 min

Measured before 15 min only.

Damage to champions per minute, at equal gold · gold against the direct opponent on a fixed ± 1,000 scale · map pressure before 15 min

In fights

itsupports
Damage absorbed per minute.
Share of its takedowns taken with several allies.
Share of its takedowns taken in a duel.
Damage from its four allies per kill when it takes part: a high rank means it lets its allies carry the damage, a low rank that it carries it itself.
Riot CC score per minute.
Share of its team's damage.

Bar centred on supports: to the right, more than them; to the left, less · fixed order, never sorted by value

What it is, what it is not

What marks itTeamfight

What it is notFew duelsLittle damageNo poke

Split-push — Not applicable to this position.

Labels set by the server: the fact's criterion when it has one, otherwise the role rank (from 75 or at 25 and below)

Its tempo

level 6 at 8:36 (8:42), 1st item at 13:42 (14:24), 2nd at 23:30 (24:24), 3rd at 30:54 (31:42).

694 games · median minute of each milestone, supports in brackets

With whom, against whom?

The win rate is a range: only a range entirely on one side of 50% says something.

Allies and opponents

Its opponents, most frequent first.

Facing	Games	Reading
YunaraADC	71	Evenbetween 40% and 59%
NautilusSUP	71	Evenbetween 43% and 62%
LuluSUP	70	Leans against itbetween 36% and 56%
WukongJGL	68	Leans its waybetween 46% and 65%
ViJGL	63	Unfavourablebetween 29% and 49%
Jarvan IVJGL	61	Leans its waybetween 45% and 66%
Kai'SaADC	56	Leans its waybetween 46% and 67%
AsheADC	51	Evenbetween 38% and 60%
ViktorMID	50	Evenbetween 39% and 61%
CaitlynADC	49	Leans its waybetween 44% and 66%

show 145 other pairs

XayahADC	49	Evenbetween 40% and 62%
AhriMID	48	Evenbetween 38% and 62%
TristanaADC	48	Evenbetween 38% and 62%
SyndraMID	46	Unfavourablebetween 26% and 49%
RakanSUP	45	Leans its waybetween 46% and 69%
K'SanteTOP	42	Evenbetween 40% and 65%
EzrealADC	42	Leans its waybetween 42% and 67%
JinxADC	42	Leans against itbetween 33% and 58%
OrnnTOP	41	Unfavourablebetween 23% and 47%
ThreshSUP	41	Evenbetween 36% and 61%
JhinADC	40	Favourablebetween 52% and 76%
LucianADC	40	Evenbetween 35% and 60%
OriannaMID	39	Leans its waybetween 48% and 73%
Xin ZhaoJGL	38	Leans against itbetween 32% and 58%
MilioSUP	38	Leans its waybetween 47% and 72%
SeraphineSUP	38	Leans its waybetween 42% and 68%
AlistarSUP	36	Evenbetween 37% and 63%
RenektonTOP	34	Evenbetween 39% and 66%
LeonaSUP	34	Leans its waybetween 42% and 69%
RellSUP	34	Leans its waybetween 42% and 69%
Lee SinJGL	33	Leans against itbetween 32% and 60%
BraumSUP	33	Leans against itbetween 29% and 57%
YoneMID	32	Favourablebetween 51% and 78%
KarmaSUP	32	Leans its waybetween 48% and 75%
HweiMID	31	Favourablebetween 53% and 80%
GnarTOP	28	Too few for a rate (28 of 30)
SivirADC	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
AmbessaTOP	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
LeBlancMID	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
BardSUP	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
BlitzcrankSUP	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
MalphiteTOP	24	Too few for a rate (24 of 30)
ViegoJGL	24	Too few for a rate (24 of 30)
NocturneJGL	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
LockeMID	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
GwenTOP	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
ShenTOP	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
Cho'GathJGL	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
SylasJGL	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
TaliyahMID	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
OlafTOP	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
SionTOP	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
NeekoSUP	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
Dr. MundoTOP	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
NasusTOP	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
RumbleTOP	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
YoneTOP	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
QiyanaJGL	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
Miss FortuneADC	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
CamilleTOP	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
AuroraMID	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
MelMID	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
RyzeMID	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
Kha'ZixJGL	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
SejuaniJGL	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
TrundleJGL	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
AkaliMID	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
LissandraMID	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
SylasMID	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
SkarnerJGL	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
GalioMID	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
ZeriADC	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
JaxTOP	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
VexMID	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
PoppySUP	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
AatroxTOP	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
MordekaiserTOP	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
LilliaJGL	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
NaafiriJGL	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
XerathMID	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
CorkiADC	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
VarusADC	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
FioraTOP	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
KennenTOP	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
SettTOP	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
ZaahenTOP	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
PykeSUP	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
GravesJGL	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
AniviaMID	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
ApheliosADC	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
KalistaADC	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
SorakaSUP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
YuumiSUP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
GarenTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
JayceTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
PoppyTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
EkkoJGL	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
CassiopeiaMID	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
Twisted FateMID	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
VeigarMID	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
MaokaiJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
ZacJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
DianaMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
LuxMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
JayceJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
NidaleeJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
GalioMID	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
SamiraADC	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
AkaliTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
Cho'GathTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
KayleTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
MaokaiTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
UrgotTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
EliseJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
HecarimJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
VayneADC	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
MaokaiSUP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
NamiSUP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
DariusTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
VolibearTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
YasuoTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
YorickTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
PantheonJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
TaliyahJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
TalonJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
ZyraJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
AnnieMID	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
MalzaharMID	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
TwitchADC	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
LuxSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
MorganaSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
DariusTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
GragasTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
SingedTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
Tahm KenchTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
TrundleTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
KindredJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
Rek'SaiJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
JayceMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
ZedMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
DravenADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
ViktorADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
ZiggsADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
CorkiTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
VarusTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
AatroxJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
IvernJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
KaynJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
Aurelion SolMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
EkkoMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
TalonMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
TristanaMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
CamilleSUP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
TaricSUP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
ZyraSUP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)

Sorted by number of games · 155 pairs in this view.

Allies and opponents over 694 games, listed from 5 games per pair; under 30 games, only W/L counts are written.

How is it built?

Keystone, spells, first skill maxed and item paths, on the fallback level that has enough games.

The usual build

Read on two patches (16.21 + 16.20), all regions. Patch does not reach 30 games (23).

Patch16.21 · 23 games, below the floor of 30
2 patches16.21 + 16.20 · 266 games
Window694 games

Keystone + secondary tree

Guardian+

Domination

88% · 233 games

Summoner spells

Flash + Heal

92% · 245 games

First maxed skill

82% · 212 games

show 4 other choices of runes, spells or skill maxed

Other runes

orSummon Aery+Resolve8% · 22 games
orGuardian+Inspiration34% · 90 games

Other spells

orExhaust + Flash7% · 18 games
orFlash + Ignite1% · 3 games

266 games at the level read · a level is read from 30 games

Item paths

3 item paths, from the most played 1st item to the least.

Locket of the Iron Solari59% · 13:54
Shurelya's Battlesong29% · 23:30
Redemption50% · 31:12
Mikael's Blessing17% · 14:18
Knight's Vow35% · 25:00
Knight's Vow12% · 12:48
Locket of the Iron Solari56% · 21:36

Each % reads along the path: at the 1st item, over the games that completed a 1st item; then, over those that made the previous steps AND completed one more item. A path stops under 10 games · median minute the item is completed, from 3 games.

show how we count

Draft, with / against and build: the filters at the top of the page (window, regions, level). What follows the meta moves fast.
In a comp and “the scene protects itself from”: 180 days of tournaments (from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12), the draft review window. A champion's kit changes little, it needs volume.
All games come from Master+ amateur tournaments. No soloQ.
A win rate is written from 30 games, always with its range. Under that threshold, wins and losses are written.
What the data does not say: the pick order (missing from the Riot API), engage (no reliable measure).